Earthquakes and Fracturing: A Possible Connection?
Posted by Soldier For Christ on November 10, 2011
A number of articles have been released in the last week or so speculating on the possibility that hydraulic fracturing was the cause of the recent earthquakes in Oklahoma, largely in response to the previously-unimagined 5.6 earthquake that shook Oklahoma and neighboring states in the Midwest…obviously a source of confusion seeing as Oklahoma isn’t exactly an earthquake-prone state.
I will provide links to a few articles at the end of this post, but I wanted to muse for a moment on how real this causal relationship might be.
First of all, what is “fracking?”
Hydraulic fracturing, or simply ”fracking,” is a process by which modern technology seeks to obtain oil reserves found underground. Many have heard of the large (or even enormous, depending on who you listen to) reservoirs of oil and natural gas in the continental United States but what isn’t always articulated is that these fossil fuels are contained within layers of underground rock. The idea behind fracturing is to drill a well into the ground, detonate (small) explosives deep within this rock layer, pressurize the well with water and other (highly) toxic chemicals to induce the flow of the oil and gas and then pump it out.
Now, before I even touch on the earth-moving subject, I should point this out: there are a number of health and safety concerns with hydraulic fracturing already. The EPA has yet to obtain from the oil companies a list of the highly toxic chemicals, and indeed has exempted the oil companies from some safety requirements. There are numerous articles and reports you can find on the internet that point to fracking as a cause of cancer, groundwater contamination (and not on a small level either), and other environmental damage.
But wait…can fracking cause earthquakes?
The answer is easily…maybe. Take Oklahoma as an example: before 2009, there were an average of 50 quakes in Oklahoma per year. Then, in 2010, that number increased to 1,047. The presumption is that this is a direct result of hydraulic fracturing…and an oil company in the United Kingdom recently admitted that their fracking operation led to seismic activity. In addition, there have been other instances where much less than something as sophisticated as hydraulic fracturing resulted in seismic activity (like a dam filling a lake with water; see articles below for details). Nevertheless, even the most vocal are merely saying that there is a connection between fracking and seismic activity; they are not saying (yet) that there is a direct connection, though one could certainly make that argument. Some are arguing that the amount of actual activity that is being done underground isn’t enough to cause earthquakes on such a scale (and certainly not on the scale of a 5.6 earthquake).
Not being a scientist myself, I cannot accurately say one way or the other. However, I do think that I can bring some common sense to the conversation, and my first thought is this: how do we know what fracking does? That is to say, we don’t have cameras watching the fracking process occur miles underground. For all we know, the fissures created by the explosions – even small explosions – are much larger than we would anticipate. And that doesn’t even have to be a universal truth; maybe it’s just in one or two places where explosions used to create the fractures cause more underground movement than we would suspect.
In response to those who argue that the underground activity from fracking is insufficient to cause earthquakes, I would argue that little things we do all the time have huge consequences. That’s simply a fact of life, from my perspective. Those who believe that humanity is causing climate change are accepting that human activity on a small scale does impact the larger environment. Even if removing oil was all that happened underground, we are removing liquid mass from deep underground. At some point, there comes a time when there are holes and caves underground that do not have structural support to stay open. So, when there is a collapse, it becomes more than just a cave collapse; it’s an earthquake. And (potentially) the longer that area goes without collapsing, the larger the collapse will be when it does occur.
Okay…so let’s stop hydraulic fracturing!
And here’s where I think that we run into the real problem. Based on the articles I perused and the points I just made, it certainly does seem likely, though not certain, that fracking causes earthqaukes. But that is really not the point. As I pointed out earlier, the EPA has relinquished a lot of its powers of enforcement over the hydraulic fracturing industry. Why? Because we in the United States are very focused (perhaps even…obsessed?) with finding the fuel necessary to power our economy, keep our cars going, our lights on, and so forth. Energy is a fundamental part of our nation’s very existence. The hydraulic fracturing industry has the potential to meet our energy needs for some time to come. In a lot of ways, I believe that in spite of a few jostles every now and then, people will not turn against hydraulic fracturing unless it can be said to cause a major, destructive earthquake…and the reality is, even though a 5.6 is significant for a region of the world that has previously had very few earthquakes at all, a 5.6 is nothing compared to a 6.0 or a 7.0.
Which, to me, is kind of sad that, if hydraulic fracturing is causing earthquakes, most people will focus more on the pros – jobs, energy, economic development – than on the possibility of some major catastrophe. Who knows, maybe such a catastrophe will never happen and the central midwest will just have to get used to a few jostles every now and again…but with the kind of crazy weather everyone has been having lately, I’m leaning more towards the line of, “Let’s not cause any more natural disasters than we have to.”
Anyway, those are my thoughts.
SfC
References
Is Gas Fracturing Inducing Earthquakes?
Did Fracking Cause the Virginia Earthquake?
Fracking Pros and Cons: Weighing in on Hydraulic Fracturing